The cinemascope has seen Batmans in the
past and it’ll continue to see Batmans in the future. But none like Christopher
Nolan’s adaptation of the caped crusader, presented across, contemporarily. And
do I say this for sure, with absolute confidence, taking into account the
technological advancements to cinematography and the whole concept of special
effects?
Yes I do. But not because I believe that
Nolan’s picturisation of Batman is cinematographically superior and will be, for
years and years to come; but because of the simple fact that his plot combines
a unique blend of complexity and an easy interpretation of the same.
Even while firmly reckoning that the world
of cinematography is not impervious to advancements by way of technology, the
construct of a movie’s plotline becomes necessary to make the whole movie a
success. And perhaps this is where Nolan’s has reaped rewards. Starting with
the Batman Begins, then onwards to the Dark Knight and now, with the Dark
Knight Rises; Nolan has moulded the comic book character singularly, to
represent an entity far separate from the Batman comics.
An entity different from the sketches
created for and in the comic books and resultantly, an entity polar opposite to
the fans’ perceiving. While all superheroes, be it Superman, Spiderman, Ironman
or any other cape-clad, mask-wearing and shying-behind-an-armour, man; have displayed emotional
weaknesses, Nolan’s Batman depicts the battle between a daytime narcissistic
and a night-time soldier’s struggle unlike any other. And this dichotomy of
Bruce Wayne effortlessly commingling with the persona of Batman is an
extrapolation, unique only to Christopher Nolan.
Of course this isn’t to say that all
previous efforts to recreate Batman for the movie-going audiences were directorial
failures. While a select assorted, out of the few Batman movies made, did work
well, a couple of hoi polloi Batman
movies filled with idiosyncrasies and uncorrelated characterisations left
behind a sorry aftertaste. Maybe these latter ones were tailor-made for those
enthusiasts who knew the ‘who-what-where-why-how’
of each character, without the director having to spell it out loud. But
regardless of being implicitly informative, fact remains that the whole
experience of watching Batman come to life was led amok and astray by these
adaptations.
Every clichéd comic
caper has a bunch of good guys and bad guys surrounding his lead act. While
directors in the past have resorted to reducing the side-kicks and the cronies
to a loose parody of themselves, Nolan has taken them and spread them out over
a three-movie jigsaw puzzle and leaving his audiences to connect the dots and
put the pieces together. Each sidekick and crony depicted, seems to have a
purpose – thus emphasising the raison d’être for Batman doing what he needs to
do.
And if the
director has sought to bring the characters to life, it’s the actors’ portrayal
of each role that has magnified the construct and the premise of each character
throughout the course of each of the three editions. The brilliant association of actors with their assigned on-screen personas throughout the course of the movie series made the audience
connect better with not just the script but also with the overall acting
prowess, culminating in a crescendo with the Dark Knight Rises.
It’s in fact in
this climax that the director seems to have set the perfect backdrop for a new start. The
start of a new journey of a new man wanting to break the ‘shackles of structuring’ and thus attempting to live up to his
newly bequeathed legacy left by a predecessor, whose paradoxical existence not
only governed the life of the fictional Gotham cityite’s, but also formed a
part of the zillions of movie-goers across the world. And this alteration of
the synonymy of Bruce Wayne and Batman to incorporate a completely new semantic,
without hindering the flow or the expectancy of what’s to follow, is what
demarcates Nolan’s directorial efforts from the rest, at its highest.
No comments:
Post a Comment